Nuke Fiasco aftermath

By Jerry Bellune
Posted 7/5/18

State regulators did as they were told this week.

The seven regulators cut SC Electric & Gas rates 15% as ordered by the state lawmakers who elect them.

A new law gave the Public …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Subscribe to continue reading. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Get 50% of all subscriptions for a limited time. Subscribe today.

You can cancel anytime.
 

Please log in to continue

Log in

Nuke Fiasco aftermath

Posted

State regulators did as they were told this week.

The seven regulators cut SC Electric & Gas rates 15% as ordered by the state lawmakers who elect them.

A new law gave the Public Service Commission 5 days to lower SCE&G rates to save ratepayers about $22 a month – $264 a year.

“It was short and sweet,” said SC Small Business Chamber CEO Frank Knapp.

The vote was unanimous on Commissioner Elliott Elam’s motion to order SCE&G to cut rates 15%.

The Legislature had acted after SCE&G and Santee Cooper abandoned their two unfinished, $9 billion nuclear reactor project.

SCE&G’s 700,000 ratepayers pressured lawmakers to end the 18% nuclear surcharge that has already cost them more than $2 billion without a penny in savings SCE&G promised in 2007.

SCE&G’s owners, SCANA Corp., filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of lawmakers “significantly reducing company revenues.”

SCANA asks the court to stop regulators from making rate cuts as lawmakers want.

Under a since-rescinded state law, the Base Load Review Act, regulators have allowed SCE&G to raise rates 9 times in 9 years.

Its 45% partner, the taxpayer-owned Santee Cooper power company, has charged its 2 million ratepayers more than $530 million for the failed project.

Those home and business owners are members of Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative in Lexington County and 19 others in the state.

SCE&G ratepayers and investors, many of them employees or retired employees, may have to pay billions of dollars more for the Lexington County-based company’s debt while company officials retired with millions of dollars.

The PSC will have to rule on that in December.

If SCE&G loses an expected lawsuit, ratepayers will pay only 3% more through Dec. 31 – a $260 million saving and company loss.

Critics argue that ratepayers should not have to pay for the failed management decisions of SCE&G and Westinghouse Electric, its bankrupt reactor contractor.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here