Fake news at a price

Jerry Bellune Jerrybellune@yahoo.com 359-7633 Photograph Image/jpg Is This Fake News?
Posted 9/19/19

the editor talks with you

Fake news and politically-motivated reporting are testing all newspapers’ 1st Amendment guarantees. I’m not exactly happy about that. The …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Subscribe to continue reading. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Get 50% of all subscriptions for a limited time. Subscribe today.

You can cancel anytime.
 

Please log in to continue

Log in

Fake news at a price

Posted

the editor talks with you

Fake news and politically-motivated reporting are testing all newspapers’ 1st Amendment guarantees. I’m not exactly happy about that. The culprits include The New York Times and Washington Post, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, ABC, CBS and NBC. Community newspapers such as ours seem to be in less danger. Believe it or not, we don’t intentionally publish fake news unless it’s in Scoop’s weekly jokes column.. Critics ask what should be done about those who slant news, suppress news that does not fit their agenda (aka global warming) or invent articles to mislead voters? Washington attorneys David Rivkin and Lee Casey see serious slips in the gap between journalism and partisan politics. ,Major newspapers, TV networks and other so-called mainstream media look for ways to oppose anything President Trump or Congressional Republicans say or do. Even the once-reliable New York Times admitted in 2016 that “balance has been on vacation” since Trump decided to run. “3 years later, the holiday continues,” the 2 former Reagan-Bush lawyers say.

In a leaked transcript of a staff meeting, Times editor Dean Baquet said, “We built our newsroom to cover one story” that President Trump “colluded with Russia and obstruction of justice to being a more head-on story about the president’s character.” Since the Mueller investigation, the new story, he said, “requires deep investigation into people who peddle hatred.” This makes the Times sound like political advocates working against Trump’s re-election. The editor seemed unaware that advocates come under campaign-finance laws, attorneys Rivkin and Casey say. Those laws exempt the media, provided they are not owned by a political party, committee or candidate. This favored treatment is justified by the media’s “unique” 1st Amendment role in our society.

What if the media turns partisan? “With the advent of the Internet and the decline of print and broadcast media,” the Supreme Court observed in 2010, “the line between the media and others who wish to comment on political and social issues becomes far more blurred.” Media exemption from campaign-finance law is open to constitutional challenge, attorneys Rivkin and Casey say. “We have consistently rejected the proposition that the institutional press has any constitutional privilege beyond that of other speakers,” the court said. The court could resolve the problem by declaring the exemption unconstitutional. This would make the media subject to campaign-finance laws.

Lawyer and author James Hasson notes that in emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee in 2016, major journalists were unmasked as coordinating with Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Among them was a Times writer who told Clinton aide Jennifer Palmieri she could “veto whatever [she] didn’t want,” then “cut parts she objected to.” A Politico reporter sent the DNC an entire story before publication. This kind of behavior destroys public trust in all of us as public watchdogs. If nothing else, they should be legally shamed for what they continue doing.

Next: Gypsy adopts a family

Like what you just read?

Inspire yourself or a loved one with a personally-autographed copy of Jerry Bellune’s “Your Life’s Great Purpose.” It gives you a road map for the kind of life God intends for you. And it’s only $20. Call 359-7633.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here